On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 07:36 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:

> > GIMP tends to claim C89 compatibility; we shouldnt assume more modern
> > language standard than GIMP does.
> Hi Øyvind
> What problems do you expect us to get if we begin to rely on an 11 year 
> old standard instead of a 21 year old standard?
> At what time has enough time passed for us to feel comfortable using the 
> improvements in C99?

As soon as enough compilers support it so that we don't loose platform

What specific C99 features are we talking about at all? Is there a
specific feature that you guys would like to use?


Gegl-developer mailing list

Reply via email to