On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 04:03:22PM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-15 at 14:12 +0200, Øyvind Kolås wrote: > > Please use bugzilla which is GEGLs normal patch/bug handling system. > > I've pushed these changes to git master - albeit with slightly > > deteriorated meta data since the diffs were manually incorporated. > > thank you, I'll use bugzilla next time. I assumed everybody just uses > git am.
We do use git am formatted patches - but attached to bugs in bugzilla instead of sent to the mailinglist - they might linger for a while, but at least not be forgotten like messages to the mailinglist more readily might be. I have workflows for picking patches from bugzilla attachements, but no sensible way to get your contribution without more manual intervention out of the mail (clients). > The unexpected part is that the test now passes, despite not doing any > processing. I have attached diff between reference and OpenCL result. > note that CPU version of the algorithm produces the exact same picture > as OpenCL (which did no processing) Odd,. both http://gegl.org/operations.html#gegl%3Avideo-degradation and https://git.gnome.org/browse/gegl/plain/tests/compositions/reference/video-degradation.png seem to have processing happening to me. /pippin _______________________________________________ gegl-developer-list mailing list List address: email@example.com List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list