On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 09:54:01AM +0100, Richard B. Kreckel wrote: > > Note that the OpenCL code in GEGL works but multi-core CPU code most > > often will be faster (in particular in GIMP with lower OpenCL coverage > > of operations than in the GEGL provided set), thus the opencl / GPU > > acceleration is most often best left off. I however think OpenCL still > > is a good fit for GPU accelerating GEGL and hope for future > > improvements to both GEGL operations and OpenCL platforms. > > I noticed that, too. And it made me wonder, because on the same hardware > Darktable seems to work much faster when OpenCL is enabled than when it > is disabled. Any clues what's so different?
I think that Darktable has a lot more OpenCL accelerated code paths, which means that the pixel data doesn't have to go back and forth between CPU and GPU memory so much. _______________________________________________ gegl-developer-list mailing list List address: firstname.lastname@example.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list