Ok. I commit it after slicing up the processing. Figured it might be a good
exercise. :-)

Regards,
Dov



On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 9:51 PM, Øyvind Kolås <pip...@gimp.org> wrote:

> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Dov Grobgeld <dov.grobg...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Though I understand the implication, but as there are currently no
>> readers that can deal with larger than RAM npy images, I suggest keeping
>> the whole buffer approach for the first commit.
>
>
> It is fine as a first commit, but the concern of not needing buffer-sized
> allocations is a general concern in GEGL, this isn't really a critical
> place; but dealing with it would be nice. :).
>
> /Ø
>
_______________________________________________
gegl-developer-list mailing list
gegl-developer-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer-list

Reply via email to