On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2008-09-13 at 08:41 -0400, Nicolas Robidoux wrote: > >> One thing which I would not mind seeing throughout the gegl code is the >> systematic use of the const keyword. > > We will happily accept patches that introduce more constness. Pippin, do > you agree?
Yes, more usage of const is a good thing. I think most of the public API has const arguments in the places where it should be, omissions there would be most important to get fixed. For the internals cleaning up the code will aid the future refactoring and make development of new features like parallel processing easier. /Øyvind K. -- «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed» -- William Gibson http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/ _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
