>From where I come from, it's a no-no to keep unused code "just in case". Normally, this kind of code tends to accumulate and never be cleaned out. On top of that, the "just in case" code tends to have to be rewritten when finally needed, as it is seldom fit for the purpose (the imagined case is often not the real case).
But, all that said, if you like to keep it, I'll respect that. Henrik 2009/3/13 Martin Nordholts <[email protected]> > Henrik Akesson wrote: > > The two implementations of GeglVisitable always returns TRUE on calls > > to "visitable_needs_visiting" (see gegl-node:957 and gegl-pad:319). > > > > It is used by gegl-visitor.c, but makes it more difficult to > > understand the code. > > > > Can I remove it? > > I think you should keep it. It doesn't make the code extremely more > complicated and keeps the door open for optimizations > > - Martin >
_______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
