Martin Nordhotls wrote:
> Personally I don't see the point in duplicating a matrix lib in
> every software, i.e. I question the introduction of GeglMatrix3 in
> the first place, I mean there certainly must be high quality libs
> for matrix operations out there, but that's a different story...

IMHO, when all you are dealing with are 3x3 matrices (which are not
arbitrary 3x3, since they represent affine + perspective
transformations), it is likely that a general purpose matrix library
would be slower. Even more so with 2x2.

So, my vote is actually for "not library."

Nicolas Robidoux


_______________________________________________
Gegl-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer

Reply via email to