On Thu, Jan 13 2011, Mark Harig wrote: >> >> No, i dpn't think so. They actually already differ substantially from >> complete-symbol. In the first place, completion is done by >> completion-at-point (which has no C-u variant); moreover, >> geiser-repl--tab will indent or go to the next error (instead of >> completing), depending on context. > > It might be appropriate to change the name of `geiser-repl--tab' to > `geiser-repl-dwim-tab', given its three-features behavior (to be > expanded to four?).
Good idea. I'll do that, and introduce C-u TAB later today or tomorrow. jao -- At bottom, every man knows perfectly well that he is a unique being, only once on this earth; and by no extraordinary chance will such a marvelously picturesque piece of diversity in unity as he is, ever be put together a second time. -Friedrich Nietzsche, philosopher (1844-1900)
