On Fri, Feb 24 2017, Scott Messick wrote: > I'm trying to start using Geiser with Chicken (new to both, but I have > used SLIME in the past and very briefly used Geiser with Racket). > > The eval commands such as C-c C-c or C-c C-b seem to never use the REPL.
they are not designed to use its buffer. the repl's process is of course used to perform the evaluation, and obtain their results. > For commands with no output, they display a result in the minibuffer. > For commands with output, whether or not there is an error, they split a > debug window and display their results and output there. Is this > behavior intended? yes. the debug window is the recipient of output. due to implementation reasons (the communications between the repl process and emacs use the process's sttandard input/output), the output of an evaluation cannot be shown in the repl buffer. > Regardless, I'd like to change it so that these commands just send their > contents to the REPL. sorry, but i'm afraid this is not currently possible (see above). > Is there a simple way to do this? The debug windows, apart from being > annoying, also seem useless: lack of syntax highlighting makes them > hard to read. I'm not sure if that's just an issue with my setup, > though. i'm not sure i understand correctly, but are your commands writing their results to stdout and that's why you need syntax highlighting? when you simply evalutate a scheme value, without writing to stdout (which is the regular operation for me), the evaluated value appears in the mini-buffer with syntax highlighting, and also in the debug window with syntax highlighting (but the window is not shown most of the time). in my case, it's very rare that my evaluations write to stdout (i.e., i almost never evaluate things like (display foo) or (write bar)), but certainly YMMV. and certainly i might be misunderstanding :) hope this helps a bit, cheers, jao -- If a listener nods his head when you're explaining your program, wake him up. - Alan Perlis, Epigrams on Programming
