I needed: (setq geiser-active-implementation '(mit))
and M-x geiser to get t.scm modeline to show (Scheme Mit/A) and allow evaluation with C-x C-e. Questions: 1. I note the evaluated expression from the scheme buffer appears under the modeline. When I use MIT Scheme Edwin this appears the same behavior. When Edwin uses the *scheme* buffer and I evaluate an expression using C-x C-e the result is printed below the evaluated expression. How does Geiser accomplish this? So far it only appears this functionality is similar using the *Geiser Mit REPL* buffer. 2. Does Geiser provide the same debugging capabilities of MIT Scheme Edwin? Just trying to get a comparison. THanks On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 6:50 PM Nicholas Papadonis < nick.papadonis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone know if this works? > > I type M-x geiser in Emacs 27.1 using Geiser packages from MELPA. I then > C-x C-f t.scm and try evaluating an expression (+ 1 1) using C-x C-e. > Emacs responds that there is no Geiser REPL for this buffer and to try M-x > geiser. All M-x geiser does is spawn the MIT Scheme REPL and does not > allow evaluation of arbitrary Scheme buffers. > > Any ideas whats going on? Perhaps I'm using this wrong? >
