THE COLLAPSE OF PUPPET REGIME, THE DISGRACEFUL DEFEAT OF US IMPERIALISM AND THE 
RISE OF TALIBAN FUNDAMENTALISM TO POWER

The deadline for the withdrawal of the imperialist occupying troops was set for 
August 31, but the puppet regime in Kabul collapsed on August 15. Despite the 
constant utterance by the American officials that the “Saigon moment” would not 
be repeated, the Kabul moment became worse. On the day Kabul fell to the 
Taliban, thousands of US military personnel were stationed at the Kabul airport 
scrambling to evacuate the US embassy. As the Taliban were waiting at the gates 
of Kabul, the American and other western diplomats were begging them to wait 
for a “peaceful” transfer of power. Thick dark smoke was rising from the 
American embassies and other western embassies from the burning of “sensitive” 
documents. The entire episode, from abandoning the embassy to their previous 
departure from the Bagram base in the middle of the night without announcement, 
is a stunning display of the military and political defeat of the American 
imperialist project in Afghanistan.

Now the US imperialists are adamantly trying to downplay their shameful defeat 
in Afghanistan. They are emphasizing that their project in Afghanistan had a 
narrow focus to defeat Al Qaeda, which was accomplished by Osama’s death in 
2011. Biden and his cohorts are downplaying their state-building objectives; 
gone are the slogans for building modern state institutions that respect “human 
rights and women’s rights.” For the failure, Biden blames the people of 
Afghanistan who, according to his imperialist and racist worldview, is 
incapable of living in harmony. Biden and the US imperialists are trying to 
hide their role in creating the now 40 years of crisis and chaos in 
Afghanistan. Although they are hardly successful at obscuring this fact because 
the history of the US imperialist role in creating and unleashing the current 
crisis and chaos is well known and well documented.
The American debacle in Afghanistan, more than anything else, shows that 
imperialists are paper tigers. But this paper tiger is truly in a stage of 
decline and decay. This debacle shows the decline of its hegemony, the fickle 
influence of its diplomacy, and the ineffectiveness of its criminally vast and 
expensive military capability.

The US had realized its failure in Afghanistan by the end of the Bush 
presidency. The Obama administration was debating cutting their losses and 
withdrawing from Afghanistan. However, the Obama administration, apparently 
under pressure from the Pentagon and the military-industrial complex, chose to 
increase the American troops to defeat the Taliban. The formation of the 
“Afghan National Defence Security Forces” [ANDSF] was the most important and 
expensive component of the “national reconstruction” project undertaken by the 
occupying forces in Afghanistan. By January 2015 the US occupying forces had 
ended its “Operation Enduring Freedom,” the name of the American imperialist 
war in Afghanistan, and handed over the responsibility of the war to the ANDSF. 
Nonetheless, the occupation of the country continued, although the occupying 
forces stayed away from the ground battlefield and only provided air support 
and continued providing training to the ANDSF. Yet the Taliban insurgency 
continued and inflicted huge casualties to the ANDSF.

The ANDSF were recruited from the poor and the unemployed and used as cannon 
fodder for a bourgeois comprador state-building project carried under 
imperialist occupation. Biden touted that the ANDSF was 350,000 compared to the 
Taliban’s 75,000 in a press conference announcing the withdrawal of the US 
troops in April. Biden also touted that the Afghan forces were better armed and 
equipped. It was thus that the US government assumed that the ANDSF would be 
able to hold on without US aerial support. But where their assessment missed 
was that the ANDSF was a mercenary force that lacked the commitment and the 
political will to fight.
The puppet regime was notoriously corrupt. The last president Ghani, who ran 
away, called his interior ministry, which controlled most of the ANDSF, as the 
“beating heart of corruption.” All government officials from the top to the 
foot soldiers viewed their position as an opportunity to get something. When US 
aerial support was withdrawn the ANDSF rapidly crumbled, surrendered their 
positions to the Taliban, and ran away. It was clear that they were unwilling 
to fight and die for a state that belonged to the bourgeois comprador class who 
were living like pharaohs. The state institutions were a burden and a system of 
oppression for the masses; the masses were receiving little from it in terms of 
services but suffering a lot from its corruption and brutality. This state was 
only good for feathering the nests of the rich. There appeared to be a 
competition among the political elite to see whose mansion and palace were the 
biggest. Or which one drives around, from home to office, for example, with the 
largest numbers of bulletproof SUVs, and armed guards?

This ruling class that was serving the US imperialists in the past twenty years 
was composed of two camps. There was a camp of western-educated technocrats who 
were the favorites of the western policymakers; they had the lion’s share of 
political power. The president running away from the country, Ashraf Ghani, is 
a good example of the first camp because, before coming to Afghanistan in 2001, 
he was a professor at John Hopkins University. The second camp of the regime is 
famously known as warlords. The warlords helped American imperialists in 
invading Afghanistan; they had worked as foot soldiers of the American 
imperialist occupation. Both wings were equally corrupt, anti-people, and 
subservient to their imperialist masters. Their immediate and primary goal was 
to expand their wealth. Government institutions were only a mechanism of 
getting rich. Of course, everyone’s share of the loot was always relative to 
their political power and political weight. For example, Karzai and his VP 
Fahim and their cronies looted around 1 billion dollars from a Kabul Bank, a 
private bank; it was a simple transfer of government money into few private 
hands. In the past twenty years, the top in the pecking order of the ruling 
classes appropriated a large number of state-owned lands. The capital 
accumulation through dispossession––such as simply turning ownership of public 
land into private property––was unprecedented in the history of the country.
The extravaganza of wealth and power of the ruling classes was unprecedented in 
the history of the country. The masses whom these pharaohs were trying to 
impress with this ostentatious display of wealth and power were of course 
overawed, but they also hated them. Such an extravaganza also encouraged and 
normalized the misuse of power and corruption. Therefore, the system was 
corrupt from the top to bottom. Even government soldiers were stealing 
ammunition, oil, and gas and selling them––most often to their enemies, the 
Taliban.

The crisis of the puppet regime in Kabul is of the same nature as the crisis of 
US imperialism, and that is the crisis of legitimacy. The puppet regime lacked 
legitimacy; it was a regime that was in the service of imperialist occupation. 
It even did not have legitimacy in the eyes of its soldiers. The soldiers knew 
they were there for an income. The soldiers also did not believe the empty 
slogans of the puppet regime; they knew that the top brass of the puppet regime 
did not believe in their own slogans. The Taliban’s rapid victory was made 
possible by the hollowness and rottenness of the puppet regime.
To save the puppet regime, the US imperialists started the Doha peace process. 
The Doha process was intended to make peace between the puppet regime and the 
Taliban, integrating the Taliban into the former’s governance. The US 
imperialists conducted prolonged negotiations with the Taliban, bypassing the 
regime. Now it is quite clear that the US diplomatic efforts in Doha were an 
utter failure; they only enhanced the Taliban’s prestige, provided them an 
international platform, and intensified the crisis of legitimacy of the puppet 
regime in Kabul.

With the Taliban takeover of Kabul, we are witnessing not only the defeat of 
American military efforts but even more glaring is the US diplomatic failure. 
The US could not even stop the Taliban from taking over the capital until the 
last US troops had left, which was supposed to be on August 31. 
In their first press conference in Kabul, the Taliban spokesperson said that 
they are in the consultation process about the exact shape of the future 
political system. It seems that the sheer speed of their victory has even 
caught the Taliban off guard. The Taliban does not have an exact idea and 
outline for their future political system. What they are insisting on is that 
the future system would be “Islamic” and “inclusive.” Now that the Taliban has 
won the war with the help of reactionary foreign powers specially Pakistan, 
they would dictate their form of political system on the country. However, the 
Taliban are now caught between their ideological commitments to re-establishing 
the Islamic Emirate and their demands of achieving international recognition. 
This tension has the potential of igniting internal friction within their 
movement. The Taliban are aware that their system of government, which they 
call Islamic Emirate, a system of government ruled by a council of mullahs 
headed by a supreme religious leader, is extremely unpopular. The Taliban 
spokesperson hinted that they are in consultation, and they could have a 
different name for their system. By willing to name their system something 
other than Islamic Emirate, the Taliban is showing political flexibility and 
the willingness to accommodate imperialists interests and other forces of the 
ruling classes, possibly sharing political power with them .

However, the Taliban now has a monopoly on violence. The emerging political 
system, no matter what its title, would be a theocracy dominated by the 
Taliban. It will be a dictatorship of the feudal bourgeois comprador class 
implemented with the whip of an austere theocracy. The theocracy will enhance 
the social oppression of women, religious, and national minorities. National 
and gender chauvinism under this theocracy would be grimmer. 
Thus, the revolutionary camp must brace for the struggle ahead. Now that the 
principal contradiction is between the people of Afghanistan and the feudal 
bourgeois comprador classes and their imperialist masters. The contradiction 
and cooperation between different reactionary camps in the ruling classes will 
continue, reflecting the contradictions and cooperation between different 
imperialist and reactionary foreign powers. Despite their contradictions, the 
new emerging semi-feudal/semi-colonial regime in Afghanistan would be 
subservient to foreign imperialists. With the retreat and the decline of the 
influence of the American imperialists in the region, the new regime would be 
closer and subservient to Russian imperialists and Chinese social imperialists… 
doubtlessly American imperialists and allies would also continue to interfere 
in the affairs of the country and the region. 

Afghanistan and other countries in the region would still be an arena of 
inter-imperialist rivalry that would intensify the contradictions between 
different reactionary camps. However, the American imperialists would support 
the emergence of a semi-feudal and semi-colonial regime of the feudal bourgeois 
comprador classes with the centrality of the Taliban.

The masses of the people hate the Taliban. Therefore, the many people are 
trying to get out of their authority. The Taliban’s reactionary nature is going 
to further alienate the masses, pushing them to fight back and resist the 
Taliban’s reactionary and anti-people policies. The revolutionary camp should 
brace for coming challenges and opportunities. The new emerging regime will be 
a lethal cocktail of class, gender, and national oppression––a guarantor of 
semi-feudal and semi-colonial obsolete social relations of oppression and 
exploitation. The Communist (Maoist) Party of Afghanistan must strive to play 
its role in strengthening the revolutionary camp and in offering a 
revolutionary alternative. 

Communist (Maoist) Party of Afghanistan
20 August 2021

Sent from Mail for Windows

-- 
Anda menerima pesan ini karena Anda berlangganan grup "GELORA45" dari Google 
Grup.
Untuk berhenti berlangganan dan berhenti menerima email dari grup ini, kirim 
email ke [email protected].
Untuk melihat diskusi ini di web, kunjungi 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/gelora1945/61227709.1c69fb81.31f50.2889SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.

Reply via email to