http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/muslim-activist-trump-brotherhood-should-be-banned

Muslim Activist to Trump: Brotherhood Should Be Banned
Dr. Qanta Ahmed asks President-elect Trump to designate the Muslim Brotherhood 
-- like its Palestinian wing Hamas-- as a terrorist organization.
BY RYAN MAUROSun, January 1, 2017

 
Muslim Brotherhood supporters in Egypt (Photo: © Reuters)



Dr. Qanta Ahmed, a Muslim activist who appeared in the Clarion Project’s Honor 
Diaries documentary about the oppression of women in the Muslim world, asked 
President-elect Trump to designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist 
organization in anew op-ed in Newsday.

She recommends designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization, 
just like its Palestinian wing, Hamas, has been designated. This is a necessary 
step in waging a broader ideological war against Islamism rather than just 
against a few specific Islamist terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and the Islamic 
State.

Dr. Ahmed writes:

Trump can start by outlawing the Muslim Brotherhood, as President Sisi did in 
Egypt. He must designate it a foreign terrorist organization and acknowledge 
that it is at the very least an indicator of extremism. Then, he must follow 
the money. If Islamism is to be exposed in America, forensic financial 
investigations must scrutinize all institutions where Islamism can flourish 
without scrutiny — mosques, charities, and advocacy groups. There can be no 
exceptions. 

The pushback against those advocating designating the Brotherhood as a 
terrorist group and making Islamism the target of U.S. strategy is that it will 
be perceived as—or even qualifies as—a war on the faith of Islam.

The West’s embrace of the Brotherhood and other Islamists is motivated by a 
false impression that they are “moderate” and a desire to avoid the appearance 
of a war on Islam where we fail to distinguish Muslim friends from Muslim foes.

Yet, Ahmed rightly points out that the current stance towards Islamism, is 
exactly that—a “profound inability by the United States to distinguish Islam 
from Islamism.”

Incoming Defense Secretary General Mattis makes a similar point:Framing the 
adversary as Islamism (Political Islam) allows a new constituency of partners 
and allies to be tapped.

On the contrary, the current administration’s set-up of terrorist vs. 
non-terrorist allows Islamists to fill the “non-terrorist” slot in the 
struggle, leaving genuine Muslim reformers out of the picture.

The U.S’ narrow focus on the symptoms of terrorist groups overlooks how the 
Muslim world itself is starting to discuss the diseases of Islamism as well as 
Islamism’s rejection of modernized interpretations of the religion.

This narrow focus on the part of the U.S. is partially rooted in the assumption 
that the Muslim world will be alienated by a broader ideological delineation 
(Islam vs. Islamism). Ironically, the West has been so fixated on declaring 
what will alienate prospective Muslim friends that it has failed to listen and 
observe what will actually alienate them.

As I recently wrote, “Overlooked allies amongst Muslims and non-Muslim 
minorities will surface as U.S. policy forces the Muslim world to take stances 
on Islamism and its adhering organizations. New allies will be born as the 
discussion of Islamism leads to rejections of it. If messaged correctly, the 
U.S. will end up with more Muslim allies of better quality.”

Dr. Ahmed argues that supporting “pluralist Muslims” against Islamism will 
allow the U.S. to build ties with this constituency:

Like Eisenhower, Trump will be at the right place, at the right time, in the 
right history. Trump will do battle with Islamism at a time when a disparate 
Muslim world is finally unifying with enormous political will to join that 
effort.

A petition has been launched urging President-elect Trump to meet with the 
Muslim Reform Movement, a pro-Western alliance of Muslims who want to challenge 
Islamism. You can sign the petition here.


The Trump administration’s strategy towards defeating Islamism will be the 
biggest factor deciding the success of U.S. foreign policy in the next four 
years.

Kirim email ke