The Technology 202: Did Andrew Yang succeed in stoking a debate on AI and 
universal basic income?

| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|  | 
Analysis | The Technology 202: Did Andrew Yang succeed in stoking a deba...

Yes and no. But he gets an A for effort.
 |

 |

 |






By Cat ZakrzewskiAugust 1 at 9:35 AM

Entrepreneur Andrew Yang speaks on the second night of the second 2020 
Democratic U.S. presidential debate in Detroit, Michigan, July 31, 2019. 
REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

Tech entrepreneur Andrew Yang joined the race with the goal of making it to a 
debate to stoke a national conversation about the threat artificial 
intelligence poses to American jobs and the need to create a universal basic 
income. 

Since last night might have been his last chance to press his message onstage, 
it's a fair time to evaluate: Did he achieve his goal? 

Yes and no. 

Yang was particularly effective at pushing his warning about the disruptive 
effect AI will have on common jobs such as trucking, and devoted particularly 
strong closing remarks to his signature proposal of giving every American 
$1,000 per month. “We need to be laser-focused on solving the real challenges 
of today, like the fact that the most common jobs in America may not exist in a 
decade, or that most Americans cannot pay their bills,” he said.

But he had the least speaking time of any candidate across both nights.. And 
Yang’s pet platforms have so far failed to catch on with other, higher-polling 
Democratic candidates. Nor did they emerge as key themes in moderators' 
questions across the first two rounds of debates.


| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|  | 
How CNN turned the second Democratic debate into a series of dogfights

Here’s which candidates got the most airtime
 |

 |

 |




In fact, Yang is the only candidate who even said the words “artificial 
intelligence” during the past two nights. He blamed the lack of attention on 
the media, which he complained focused on the fact he wasn't wearing a tie 
instead of his policy positions, and on his opponents for trying to drag each 
other down on other political hot-button issues. 

“Instead of talking about automation and our future, including the fact that we 
automated away 4 million manufacturing jobs, hundreds of thousands right here 
in Michigan, we're up here with makeup on our faces and our rehearsed attack 
lines, playing roles in this reality TV show,” Yang said. “It's one reason why 
we elected a reality TV star as our president.”

All this highlights just how difficult Yang’s goal is in a bitterly competitive 
field, and being just one of 20 candidates to qualify for the first two rounds 
of debates.  

Yang may be out of chances to make an impact. It remains to be seen if Yang 
will qualify for the third round of debates in September. The Democratic 
National Committee requires candidates to both reach 2% in four DNC-approved 
polls and obtain 130,000 donors from 40 states. Yang has met the donation 
threshold, and earlier this week his campaign announced he also hit the polling 
requirement. But the DNC rejected Yang for submitting two NBC-sponsored polls, 
saying that candidates can only count one, according to The Hill. 

Yang's performance was especially fiery considering CNN moderators gave him 
little opportunity to talk about his economic concerns. Last night CNN 
moderators asked only one question about how they would balance the disruptive 
effect automation can have on jobs against its benefits, and they aimed the 
question at Sen. Michael F. Bennet (D-Colo.). Bennet didn’t directly answer the 
question, suggesting the U.S. needs to invest more domestically in 
infrastructure rather than in conflicts in the Middle East. 

In the first round of debates in June, California Rep. Eric Swalwell, who has 
since dropped out of the race, also weighed in on the issue. But so far none of 
the top-polling candidates such as former vice president Joe Biden, Sens. 
Bernie Sanders (Vt.) or Elizabeth Warren (Mass.) have bitten. It's unclear if 
anyone will bother bringing it up if Yang doesn't qualify for the next round, 
given how much attention has been spent on health care and immigration.

Yang, the former head of Venture for America, a nonprofit that sends 
entrepreneurs into cities to help revitalize them, has garnered strong support 
online from supporters known as the “Yang Gang” and from prominent figures in 
Silicon Valley. His donor base includes Twitter chief executive Jack Dorsey and 
Y Combinator chairman Sam Altman.. 


| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|  | 
Jack Dorsey, Nicolas Cage among Andrew Yang's growing list of high-profi...

Andrew Yang, the 44-year-old tech entrepreneur running for president, might not 
be a household name yet, but he ...
 |

 |

 |




But alongside sitting members of Congress, governors, mayors and a former vice 
president, some of Yang's ideas can seem out of left field. His response to a 
question on climate change was widely panned on Twitter after he suggested the 
best way to combat climate change is to start moving people to “higher ground” 
and give them economic resources to protect themselves. 

>From Cook Political Report national editor Amy Walter:


Wait. Did Andrew Yang just say we all need to literally move to higher ground 
so that we won't die in a climate induced disaster?
— amy walter (@amyewalter) August 1, 2019


| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|  | 
amy walter on Twitter

“Wait. Did Andrew Yang just say we all need to literally move to higher ground 
so that we won't die in a climate...
 |

 |

 |




Whether or not Yang makes it back to our prime-time TVs, he gets an A for 
effort to get a critical topic in the tech industry into the political 
discussion. From Shareblue senior writer Oliver Willis:


in 100 years people will say
"the only one who warned us about the robots and ai was andrew yang"
— Oliver Willis (@owillis) August 1, 2019


| 
| 
| 
|  |  |

 |

 |
| 
|  | 
Oliver Willis on Twitter

“in 100 years people will say"the only one who warned us about the robots and 
ai was andrew yang"”
 |

 |

 |




You are reading The Technology 202, our guide to the intersection of technology 
and politics.






Kirim email ke