Pada zaman bahula ketidak kerajaan Mojopahit, apakah rakyat mempunyai
kebebasan? Jadi kalau pada zaman neo-Mojopahit berkuasa tentu saja  tradisi
politik masa lalu adalah bahagian dari kehidupan masa sekarang.

https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/11/07/from-buzzers-to-prosecutions-indonesias-internet-freedom-under-threat.html


*From 'buzzers' to restrictions: Indonesia's internet freedom declining,
report says*

Ardila Syakriah

The Jakarta Post


Jakarta   /   Fri, November 8, 2019   /   08:51 am


The Indonesian Internet Service Provider Association (APJII) recorded that
171 million people, 64.8 percent of the total population of 264 million
Indonesians, were connected to the internet in 2018. (Shutterstock/Creativa
Image


Indonesia has witnessed a decline in internet freedom over the past year,
largely as a result of on-and-off restricted access to social media and
manipulation of content for political gain during the April elections,
according to Freedom House's latest report.

The think tank’s Freedom on the Net 2019 report on Indonesia’s internet
freedom ranks the country as “partly free”, scoring 51 in a scale of 0 to
100 ─ with 0 considered least free and 100 most free ─ a slight decline
from its score of 54 in the previous year.

The report, which is based on an evaluation between June 2018 and May 2019,
revealed that despite steadily increasing internet penetration, Indonesians
still face obstacles to surfing the internet because of the government’s
intermittent restrictions on social media.

The restrictions were imposed mainly following the polarized presidential
election in April between President Joko “Jokowi” Widodo and losing
candidate Prabowo Subianto, with the latter’s supporters alleging Jokowi’s
victory was the result of electoral fraud.

During post-election protests that later descended into riots in the
capital, the government restricted access to social media platforms and
online messaging apps between May 22 and 24, citing the need to curb the
spread of hoaxes and misinformation.

The violent protests were used as "a justification by authorities to
restrict social media and communication platforms", the report says.

Restrictions on connectivity returned in August for weeks when the
government imposed an internet blackout in Papua and West Papua, citing
security concerns as antidiscrimination and pro-independence protests
flared up.

Freedom House also reported that the recent presidential election saw
manipulated content and disinformation online that reached unprecedented
levels compared with those observed in the 2014 presidential election

"Coordinated manipulation of online content by the government, its allies
and other political actors has distorted the information landscape. [...]
political actors exploited the prevailing divisions and delegitimized the
electoral process for political gain," the report says.

According to the report, the camps of both presidential candidates
reportedly hired online campaign strategists who mobilized paid commenters
known as “buzzers” and automated accounts to spread political propaganda
ahead of the election.

One buzzer led a team with 250 fake accounts on major social media
platforms, including Facebook, WhatsApp, YouTube and Twitter, the report
said, and that spam accounts on Twitter had manipulated and amplified
hashtags to benefit certain presidential candidates.

The government’s move to frequently block online content it deems to be in
violation of  laws or social norms as well as an increasing number of
prosecutions for online activities ─ by means of the draconian Electronic
Transactions and Information (ITE) law ─ also contributed to Indonesia’s
declining internet freedom.

Freedom House cited a Southeast Asia Freedom of Expression Network
(SAFEnet) report that recorded at least 20 new prosecutions under the ITE
Law from June 2018 to May 2019, with an additional nine cases in July 2019
alone. Furthermore, the report said, the National Police arrested 122
people for hate speech on social media in 2018 alone.

“Authorities have also increasingly targeted online discourse that is
critical of the government by labeling it hate speech, which could
potentially limit the willingness of journalists and users to criticize the
government online," says the report.

The report cited as an example the case of Muhammad Yusuf, a journalist
with the online news outlet *Kemajuan Rakyat*, who was arrested and charged
with hate speech in April 2018 after he reported critically on a land
dispute between farmers and a palm oil company owned by an influential
local businessperson.

In June 2018, Yusuf died in detention while awaiting trial, which according
to the National Commission on Human Rights was a result of the detention
facility’s failure to provide proper health care and treatment.

A number of journalists have also been subjected to doxing and other forms
of harassment after publishing online content, the report says, citing an
example of a *detik.com <http://detik.com>* journalist who fell victim
after he included in his reporting a quotation from a prominent figure who
urged people to vote against Jokowi.

Doxing refers to the publishing of private or identifying information about
individuals on the internet, usually with malicious intent.

Minority groups have also become online targets, the report says, with
content related to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT)
community continuing to be subject to removal and restrictions by
authorities.

In doing this, the government routinely requires platforms and content
hosts to remove what it regards as negative content posted by users, the
report went on, raising concerns of arbitrary and nontransparent blocking
procedures.

For instance, Google reportedly removed a total of 73 apps with LGBT themes
from its online store upon the request of the Communications and
Information Ministry.

There is growing pressure on companies to “police” content, resulting in
censorship of political and social material, as platforms that do not
comply in removing what the government describes as negative content risk
being blocked entirely.

For example, Tumblr was blocked in March 2018 only to be unblocked in
December after removing “adult content” from its platform.

"Laws and procedures regulating the government’s ability to restrict online
content are largely not grounded in democratic principles," the report says..

Kirim email ke