hi, i'll commit the bug report as u mentioned! for the pix_buffer....it didn't make any difference but maybe i used it in a wrong way..don't know! mfg johann
Am 23. April 2009 10:40 schrieb <[email protected]>: > Quoting "johann scholz" <[email protected]>: > > hi there, >> >> finally fixed the problem with loads of help from one of my >> teachers(actually he fixed it)! >> now i am able to sort of preload the image sequences for >> the pix_multiimage object, i didn't quite figured it all out >> how it works, but i would gladly share the patch if someone >> is interested..... >> to be honest the "too many files problem" isn't really solved >> i can preload the sequences and so they won't be loaded again >> and again, but i bet there is a limit of files i can preload too, so >> i'll push it to the max, to see how deep the rabbit hole really goes :) >> > > > good that it works for you for now. > in the meantime, could you please commit a bug-report (with full specs, > like Gem version, OS, image-type and example-patch that triggers the problem > and probably more) at http://sf.net/projects/pd-gem/ > > > oh, and did it make a difference when using [pix_buffer] instead of > [pix_multiimage]? > > > fmgasdr > IOhannes > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. >
_______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
