On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]>wrote:
> > 64-bit Gem on Mac OS X could drop Quicktime/Carbon in favor of gstreamer > and/or gmerlin which I believe is already implemented on GNU/Linux. > That would throw away the advantages of QT on OSX, and I would probably no longer use GEM if that happened. > Then its just window management, which doesn't seem so huge, but I haven't > done it before. > It would require interfacing the C++ code with Objective-C. It is possible, but fairly masochistic. > Am I right in assuming that Gem could really benefit by 64-bit because it > would allow it to use more than 4 gigs of RAM? > > I cannot recall anyone ever saying they hit this limit. Even the massive projects I did using many HD clips and capture never got close to this. > >
_______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
