-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > I just noticed while looking into the -fno-common thing that Gem is > compiling on Mac OS X using -mmacosx-version-min=10.3 AFAIK, Gem hasn't > built on 10.3 in years. From my experience, there are less deployment
do you mean "hasn't built" or "hasn't been built"? if the former, are the problems fixable. if the latter, it doesn't matter. > issues if things are built for the most recent supported version (i.e. > 10.4). which "issues"? fgmasdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkscJ2oACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvTVswCfam4hS7XOPJR7ufIlP/mphzdw mT8An2eUZIPTDkRRNCpiwzXKIwDVJ0fp =91v5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
