On 03/26/2011 08:35 AM, Matthias Kronlachner wrote: > Am 26.03.11 00:03, schrieb IOhannes zmölnig: >> On 03/25/2011 10:31 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >>> I'll be more specific: On Mac OS X 10.5 and 10.6, pix_film, pix_movie, >>> and pix_video are not working for the Pd-extended 0.43 nightly builds >>> and I have no idea how to make them work. >> what does "not working" mean (apart from 'not working')? >> >> also if they don't work at all, this should be fixed rather than >> spending time on [pix_kinect] > the problem with libusb will probably be the same with videoKINECT on osx. > so the work is not for nothing :-)
right. that's why i deleted "wasting" in my original email and replaced it by "spending". > > in the moment the pix_freenect is a little bit better (less bugs i > think) than the videoKINECT but i will try to improve videoKINECT after > the weekend. cool. mfgadsr IOhannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
