I didn't realize there was an active Git repository for Gem. Although it is liked to at the Gem page (bottom-right link), the Pd getting soucres page only mentions the SVN. http://puredata.info/docs/developer/GettingPdSource
Which caused me to write further documentation based on that info. So I would like to know if developers should abandon SVN so that I can update some docs at puredata.info. I am curious to hear the answers to Hans' questions. Best, Ricardo Fabbri Linux registered user #175401 On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> >> On Oct 20, 2011, at 4:09 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 2011-10-18 21:47, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey IOhannes, >>>> >>>> I would like to include the latest version of Gem in Pd-extended 0.43. >>>> It currently needs a little work. It builds on GNU/linux, but gives a >>>> missing symbol (something like _sync_foo_bar). >>> >>> it builds on "GNU/linux" without the missing symbols as well, else i >>> coulldn't use it myself :-) >>> i assume that this is on some ubuntu flavour (which one), with a certain >>> compiler version (which one) and some special C(XX)FLAGS. >>> >>> according to the internet, adding something like "-march=i486" to the >>> C(XX)FLAGS should help. >> >> I think that one might be might fault. I made it so it set CFLAGS for Gem >> in externals/Makefile. I removed that, but haven't tested it again yet. >> >> >>>> It doesn't build on Mac >>>> OS X 10.5. >>> >>> what does "latest Gem" mean here? >>> the git version (which is indeed the 'latest') of Gem has the issue >>> fixed. >>> the 'svn' version (both trunk and branch/0.93) and the releases have it >>> not fixed (yet). >>> >>> if you want/must stick to the current release (which is fair enough) or >>> svn, a very simple workaround would be to add /sw/bin to the beginning >>> of the PATH before calling Gem's autogen.sh >> >> >> I am waiting on definitive answers on two questions, until then, I'm >> sticking to the current setup. >> >> - are you dropping support for the Gem SVN? >> >> - are you dropping support for building on Mac OS X 10.5 without Fink? > > Oops, one more question: > > - are you planning on making Mac OS X builds? > > .hc > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; > my wish has come true because I can no longer figure out how to use my > telephone." --Bjarne Stroustrup (creator of C++) > > > _______________________________________________ > GEM-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev > _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
