yes this is the only thing i did
I heard i'm not the only one who tried to set input (aka. channel property)
to V4L2 dev
and looking at the code, i realized that it's already implemented but not
enumerate
i was thinking it's a shame so i added it to enumeration...

and nothing is wrong with width and height, i just added them to
enumeration to make no jealous :-)

cheers

a.



2012/6/5 IOhannes m zmoelnig <[email protected]>

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 2012-06-05 13:09, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> > On 2012-06-05 12:45, Antoine Villeret wrote:
> >> hello,
> >
> >> i made a small change to plugins/videoV4L2 in order to expose
> >> channel, frequency, norm, width and height parameters to pd
> >
> > what's wrong with width&height in the current implementation?
>
> ah.
> looking at your patch i see that you only added the keys to the
> enumeration.
> so you already could have changed the values, but the interface did
> not tell you so (mainly because for compat reasons it was kind of
> clear that you could _set_ those values)
>
> fgamsdr
> IOhannes
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk/N6eMACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvRXpACgn3jkSqIyzjO62pJKeBaHnvfn
> yIwAn0SsdUpw1/r6VaHa+fIVzEvnIGMp
> =q72y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GEM-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev

Reply via email to