-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-03-19 16:06, Antoine Villeret wrote: > this is in my github repos in the branch pix_share_write : > https://github.com/avilleret/Gem/tree/pix_share_write
hehe, i have incorporated your changes about 7 hours ago :-) > > I don't know if it's a good idea but it seems to work for me generally, i find it always pleasing, if an error is not (only) printed to the pd-console but you get some message back into the patch, so you can react on the error programmatically. > I'm wondering if it could be good to have a dictionary instead of a > hash table : when we use [set id sizex sizey pixel_format( message, > pix_share* could try to find the id in the dictionary if there is > no entry with that id, it generates a random shmem id, verify that > nobody else is using it and tries to allocated data if it fails it > could generates another id until it succeed and store the id in the > dictionary > > pix_share_read will know the dictionary and can find the right > shmem id how is that supposed to work in two separate instances of Pd? fgamsdr IOhannes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlFIiw8ACgkQkX2Xpv6ydvQxGgCePjlJJTseMuPVMhuYQGWkavgv u10AoMhpJaE6OsdPQk7HbhmMM0W75aTo =5+nU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ GEM-dev mailing list GEM-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev
