- **labels**: Pixes (pix_ objects) --> Pixes (pix_ objects), pix_film, 
DirectShow, w32
- **Group**: win32 --> 0.93



---

** [bugs:#100] pix_film with DS eats up cpu in W32**

**Status:** open
**Group:** 0.93
**Labels:** Pixes (pix_ objects) pix_film DirectShow w32 
**Created:** Sat Mar 27, 2010 04:26 PM UTC by Matteo Sisti Sette
**Last Updated:** Sat Mar 27, 2010 04:26 PM UTC
**Owner:** nobody

When I send an \[open\( message to a pix\_film object, if it uses DirectShow 
\(as opposed to QuickTime\) to decode the file, it starts consuming an enormous 
amount of cpu: around 30% of a 2.5GHz Intel Core Duo machine. Furthermore, it 
never stops eating that much cpu, even if you stop repdorucing the file \(by 
setting auto to 0 and not changing the frame through the right inlet\) and even 
if you disconnect it from the gemhead.

This happens with file encoded with various codecs: DV-PAL, H.264, Animation+, 
and I suspect everything else.

Note that if I open the files with QuickTime instead of DS \(by appending the 
proper number to the open message\), then this does not happen: the impact of 
opening the file on the CPU is minimal, almost impossible to note, and it only 
consumes cpu during few seconds after opening the file, and when \_actually\_ 
playing it \(i.e. a gemhead connected to it and changing frame\). That is, with 
quicktime pix\_film only consumes CPU when it is supposed to, and it is much 
much less CPU: you can easily read 6 full-size DV-PAL files actually rendering 
some portion of them on the screen, and you can have a dozen of pix\_film with 
\[open\(ed files without impact on CPU \(or even many more, then the impact 
won't be on CPU but on performance in general due to the memory trashing\).

This can't be normal: DirectShow is supposed to be much faster than QuickTime 
on Windows; also, any given media player will open a video file using 
DirectSHow and without eating up nearly as much cpu, especially when not 
playing.
There must be something wrong in GEM.




---

Sent from sourceforge.net because [email protected] is subscribed to 
https://sourceforge.net/p/pd-gem/bugs/

To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at 
https://sourceforge.net/p/pd-gem/admin/bugs/options.  Or, if this is a mailing 
list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list.
_______________________________________________
GEM-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/gem-dev

Reply via email to