I think there are several cases of the tree not building.  I think we
need to add a "compile everything" regression test.

SPARC_FS also doesn't build either way.  Let's get these two fixed and
see if there are others.

  Nate

2008/6/5 Lisa Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> same result with the tip of m5-old.  i'm looking into it, but i don't really
> know what the deal is.
>
> lisa
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:09 PM, nathan binkert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Can you try the old repo?
>>
>>  Nate
>>
>> 2008/6/4 Lisa Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> > x86_se from the tip of the new repo is not building on my mac, here's
>> > the
>> > error:
>> >
>> > g++ -o build/X86_SE/arch/x86/linux/linux.fo -c -pipe
>> > -fno-strict-aliasing
>> > -Wall -Wno-sign-compare -Werror -Wundef -O3 -DTHE_ISA=X86_ISA -DNDEBUG
>> > -DTRACING_ON=0 -Iext/dnet
>> >
>> > -I/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.4/include/python2.4
>> > -Ibuild/libelf -Ibuild/X86_SE build/X86_SE/arch/x86/linux/linux.cc
>> > build/X86_SE/arch/x86/linux/linux.hh:115: error: expected unqualified-id
>> > before '[' token
>> > scons: *** [build/X86_SE/arch/x86/linux/linux.fo] Error 1
>> >
>> >
>> > i feel like i've seen this before for mips maybe, but ali committed the
>> > fix
>> > so i don't know what it was.  i'm STILL lame and running tiger.
>> >
>> > lisa
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Gabe Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Whatever is easy is fine. Running the SE regressions would work and
>> >> I'll
>> >> just fix FS if it breaks. I have very little time since I'm leaving at
>> >> 5 in
>> >> the morning and I'm still getting everything together.
>> >>>
>> >>> What are you thinking of?  It's not likely that any of us can
>> >>> effectively test x86.  For you, it should just be a simple matter of
>> >>> cloning the new repo, copying your .hg/patches directory over.
>> >>> deleting .hg/patches/status in the new location, hg qpush and compile.
>> >>>
>> >>>  Nate
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> m5-dev mailing list
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> m5-dev mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > m5-dev mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to