Hi, Great work. I noticed you added support for multithreading for simple CPUs. I wouldn't mind figuring out checkpoints with the multithreaded simple CPUs as it would free me from EIO trace madness. Let me know when the patches are in m5.
-Rick jiayuan meng wrote: > Thanks! > Yeah, I used mercurial queue to manage the patches. Ali and Steve > helped me with that. > I'll see if I can pull out the most recent version, and please give me > some time to update the > patch for the new changeset. > > Jiayuan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 16:50:19 -0700 > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [m5-dev] submit patches: Mesh2D, directory coherence, > and multithreading > > > > Wow, that's fantastic. The best thing you can do is get your code > > working with the new repository using mercurial and mercurial queues. > > If you do that, then we can work with you to make sure that the code > > meets all of the requirements (doesn't break things, is reasonably > > organized, meets the style guidelines, etc.) > > > > Did you use a revision control system as you did your work? > > > > Thanks, > > Nate > > > > 2008/7/11 jiayuan meng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Dear all, > > > > > > I appreciate all your support to help me with M5. I really love > it. I'm > > > a graduate student working with Prof. Kevin Skadron at University of > > > Virginia. And now, > > > I'd like to submit patches to M5 that enables it to simulate CMP > > > architecture. > > > > > > I have a mesh2D model that works well with an MSI directory coherence > > > protocol. > > > Both the interconnection and directory coherence models are > extendable. > > > Another patch is to support multithreading for simple CPUs. The > cpu can > > > switch to another HW thread context if it has a data access. > > > > > > However, atomic modes are not well tested. And I haven't considered > > > checkpoints. > > > > > > The mercurial patches are based on changeset 5291:456a50cf2a67, a > version > > > after 2.0beta4 but before 2.0beta5. > > > As an "external developer", how do you think I should submit the > patches? An > > > do you think it would be necessary to update the patches so they > are based > > > on a more recent changeset? > > > If so, which changeset? > > > > > > Just hope it might be useful. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Jiayuan Meng > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger. > IM on > > > your terms. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > m5-dev mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > m5-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger. IM > on your terms. > <http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_messenger_072008> _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
