Because the machines were busy, which meant that the jobs timed out.

Ali

On Aug 24, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Gabe Black wrote:

> We should also figure out why the "all" regressions failed completely
> last night.
>
> Gabe Black wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure that perlbmk bug is still there and we just got rid  
>> of
>> the regression. It might have gone away on it's own, but I don't  
>> think
>> anyone actively tried to fix it.
>>
>> Gabe
>>
>> Ali Saidi wrote:
>>
>>> From the release notes the following are still outstanding for a 2.0
>>> release. I don't really care about the Cygwin problems and I'm not
>>> sure that anyone else does, so I move to strike those. Additionally,
>>> we made the repository public so that one is gone.
>>>
>>> I think the three things that need to be fixed are:
>>> O3 CPU -- SMT SE regression hits an assert; bug causing perlbmk to
>>> fail (Gabe reported this in April 2007 and I don't know if it's  
>>> still
>>> a problem http://www.m5sim.org/flyspray/task/221); NACKs/coherence
>>> messages
>>>
>>> Statistics -- The CPU statistics are confusing. I think the idle  
>>> time
>>> in the simple CPU can still be wrong after a CPU switch and it's at
>>> least not clear to me which idles mean quiesced time or idle because
>>> of other things (blocked in the O3 case, not switched out in the
>>> simple case); The bus needs statistics; I don't know if the cache
>>> statistics are reasonable.
>>>
>>> Testing -- I've at least done a fair amount of testing over the last
>>> month or two, so I'm pretty happy with that. I think some validation
>>> needs to be done on an statistics changes though.
>>>
>>> Ali
>>>
>>>     
>>>
>>> 1. Fix O3 CPU bug in SE 40.perlbmk fails
>>> 2. Fix O3 processing nacks/coherence messages
>>> 3. Better statistics for the caches.
>>> 4. FS mode doesn't work under Cygwin
>>> 5. memtest regression crashes under Cygwin
>>> 6. Make repository public
>>> 7. Testing
>>> 8. Validation
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 24, 2008, at 9:55 AM, Ali Saidi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Everyone should hold off pushing patches to the dev tree for the  
>>>> next
>>>> two weeks so we can create a new stable release. Please only push
>>>> fixes to known problems and test the repository in the next two  
>>>> weeks.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Ali
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> m5-dev mailing list
>>>> m5-dev@m5sim.org
>>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> m5-dev mailing list
>>> m5-dev@m5sim.org
>>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> m5-dev mailing list
>> m5-dev@m5sim.org
>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> m5-dev@m5sim.org
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
m5-dev@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to