I feel like I'm missing some context with this patch (though I will admit to not following the mailing list very closely after the last few months. Was this the solution to us not being able to switch back to timing from detailed? Can you write up a commit message?
At first glance, it seems correct. I'll just double check, and when I get your commit message, I'll apply it. Thanks for the patch! Nate On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 12:16 AM, David A. Ramos <[email protected]> wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User David Ramos <[email protected]> > # Date 1231142438 18000 > # Node ID 122cc03013a106e722593bee490d4b8210c623a4 > # Parent 50c9d48de3caa629a27408bf5f3423656ae15da1 > [mq]: switchtotimingsimplecpu.diff > > diff --git a/src/cpu/simple/timing.cc b/src/cpu/simple/timing.cc > --- a/src/cpu/simple/timing.cc > +++ b/src/cpu/simple/timing.cc > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ > ThreadContext *tc = threadContexts[i]; > if (tc->status() == ThreadContext::Active && _status != Running) { > _status = Running; > + schedule(fetchEvent, nextCycle()); > break; > } > } > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
