On Jan 27, 2009, at 8:11 PM, Rick Strong wrote:

> Hi all and especially Ali,
>
> I have been working with the webnew benchmark (specweb95-apache) and
> have noticed two problems that kill throughput and was wondering if  
> you
> have encountered them or know what is happening
>
> (1) All requests handled by the server server are coming back 404  
> (File)
> Not Found. Nate mentioned that you figured out this was due to a bad
> mod_specweb99.so. If you know what is going on in this situation, any
> help would be great.
I've never heard of the webnew benchmark. I would check  the apache  
configuration and make sure the files are where they should be. The  
404 error here has nothing to do with simulation and is just a  
misconfiguration of the workload.

>
> (2) Some simulations (a small subset) using a vanilla M5 kernel have  
> the
> server receive a packet that it believes is Out-Of-Order (even  
> though it
> has the right seq number that the server put in its previous ack). The
> result is the client sends a Dup ACK. The server does not respond for
> 200 ms and the client then times out and re-requests 6 files on 6
> different ports (6 files in total). A more detailed account follows.  
> The
> time delta between 1-2, 2-3, and 3-4 is 10s of microseconds
There are three possibilities here:
a) A kernel bug
b) a device model/driver bug
c) a checkpointing bug (as it relates to (b))

What kernel version are you using? Could you put the ethernet trace  
somewhere so I could look at it?

Ali


>
> 1): server responds to previous request with ack:232 len:431
> 2): client requests new file (GET) with seq:232 len:77
> 3): server  responds with TCP Out-Of-Order with ack:232 len:431
> 4): client responds with TCP Dup ACK with seq:309 len:0
> 5): client times out and re-requests files with seq:239 len:77 200ms  
> later
>
> *this data is from the ethernet trace
>
> If you have experienced this problem and/or know of a solution, please
> let me know what I can do to avoid this disruptive pause in packet
> transmission.
>
> Best,
> -Rick
> _______________________________________________
> m5-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to