On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:13 PM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote:
> It'd also be easy for us to just not use libm5_foo.a as an > intermediate step to m5.foo. We could easily just skip the archive > step unless you explicitly ask for it. > I'd be in favor of this. Steve
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
