Thank you for reminding me of that. Unfortunately, it tests basically the inverse of what we have support for at the moment which is long mode. It would be a good starting point though.
Gabe Quoting "Adler, Michael" <[email protected]>: > I asked around here whether there is a public test suite that would work > for you. Some suggested that QEMU already has a test program to do what > you want for the x86 ISA. You might look there before writing one yourself. > > -Michael > > Gabe Black wrote: > > I changed the subject of this to try to pretend to be a little > > dignified. It's a stretch I realize. Anyway, I've discovered part of why > > the output of init I sent out earlier is garbled. The relevant chunk of > > the trace is below if you're curious. Finding this made me realize that > > it would be very useful to have a large test program that did nothing > > but make sure that adds add, that flags are set correctly, that if you > > try to access sph you get it, etc. The example programs I've run have > > flushed out a lot of those problems, but I'm sure there are still a lot > > in there. As M5 gets to be more and more correct, those bugs will be > > harder and harder to diagnose or even run across accidentally like they > > have been. > > > > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
