I think that Steve is the only one who both pays attention to the list and might understand what's going on here.
Nate On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Gabe Black <gbl...@eecs.umich.edu> wrote: > I was working on getting the X86_FS working with the timing simple > CPU as well as it does with atomic, and found that when called in my > page table walker, sys->getMemoryMode() is very definitely giving the > wrong answer. I suspect there's something I didn't do quite right when > setting up the system object, but since part of that is in python I > wasn't sure how it all went together. Why might my system object think > it's in atomic mode when it's actually in timing? How does it end up > assuming one mode or the other? > > Gabe > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
