> Actually I take that back. That's how it would work if we used > inheritance. The BaseTLB doesn't actually know to translate anything, so > the UTB would provide it's own implementation directly. You'd still > assign it to both ITB and DTB parameters.
I still don't understand why there isn't truly just one TLB class. What would the UTB class be for? Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
