On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 4:16 PM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote: >> OK, well I just unintentionally found that scons doesn't reliably >> terminate on ^C even outside of the regressions (like when compiling >> or doing the autoconf stuff) so sticking with the current plan is at >> least no worse than that. > Really? I don't recall ever really having that problem.
Yea, me neither, but it just happened. Maybe I caught some weird time window. I think it was in the autoconf phase. Steve _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
