On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:12 PM, nathan binkert <[email protected]> wrote: >> +class SimObjectCollection(SimObject): >> + type = 'SimObjectCollection' > > SimObjectCollection Seems like a pretty long name. Is there something > ambiguous about calling it Collection or Container?
Yea, it seems to me that 'Collection' by itself is totally ambiguous... probably describes half the STL, among other things. I agree that SimObjectCollection is a long name but you don't have to type it that often, and I didn't hesitate to use plain "collection" in places where it wasn't likely to have a conflict, like file names. If all the SimObject classes were in a SimObject namespace in C++ then I'd be more open to abbreviating it. Steve _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
