I did. I also found a bug in SPARC which has been in there since November of 2006. The parenthesis in inUserMode are wrong so that when tracing in FS mode, it tries to access the wrong miscreg which happens to panic. I'm running SPARC regressions right now, and assuming they pass, is that something I should add to stable?
Gabe nathan binkert wrote: > Can you at least update that regression? I think it's just very > slight stats diffs and Korey thought they were fine. > > Nate > > On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Gabe Black<[email protected]> wrote: > >> nathan binkert wrote: >> >>>> The stable repository is now up to date with the development repository. >>>> >>>> >>> Not that I think it's a bad thing to update stable, but did you verify >>> that all regressions pass? For example, I think that there are still >>> two inorder regressions that fail. Also, are there any known bugs at >>> this point that need to be fixed? >>> >>> >>> Nate >>> _______________________________________________ >>> m5-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >>> >>> >> I didn't, and looking at the last full regressions I see the failing in >> order runs. I'm not aware of any other known bugs in anything that would >> be expected to work other than the simple timing trace bug that Geoff >> found a while ago. >> >> Gabe >> _______________________________________________ >> m5-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
