Hi Tim, I noticed this a few days ago. The names aren't wrong, but they are architecture specific and currently there is only one set of them defined. The 'right' way is to split up the ioctl() by ISA, however since all we do is ignore them, I'm not certain that that effort is required.
Thanks, Ali On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:03:01 +0100, Timothy M Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > My final post for today, I hope :-P > > One of my binaries needed an unimplemented ioctl command code (TCSETAW). > This patch adds it. > > However, I have a question about these codes and their names. At least > in the kernel I'm looking at (2.6.15), there isn't a TIOCGETA or a > TIOCGETS which are used in sim/syscall_emul.hh . However, there is a > TCGETA and TCGETS which I believe is what is meant. Are these names > wrong and should I change them? (Presumably this would require changing > all ISAs?) > > Cheers > Tim _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
