On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, nathan binkert wrote: > In general, I'm fine with ignoring things and hoping it works. I > think we should probably change the warn to warn_once.
I think that's a good idea. > Similarly, some of the syscalls that we're ignoring should probably > have a warning. > Maybe unimplementedFunc should really just be warn_once plus return error? I also agree that ths would be a good idea. Not sure if my opinion matters, but I was thinking this same things when working on the syscall code. Vince _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
