Yeah, that's a better way of doing things since managing duplicates somewhat defeats the purpose of revision control. Silly me.
nathan binkert wrote: >> I was wondering if I can somehow specify in an EXTRAS directory >> SConsopts file that I want scons to build the sim/eventq.cc and >> sim/eventq.hh files in my EXTRAS directory instead of the ones in the m5 >> source tree without adding a whole bunch of conditional clauses in the >> SConscript files in the source tree. >> >> I'm making changes to the core of m5 but would like to be able to code >> it all in an EXTRAS directory so that I can keep things nice and clean. >> I've been coding in the source tree up until now but it's becoming >> somewhat of a mess. >> > > We don't currently support this and I'm not sure that we want to. Why > is coding within the source tree a problem? In general, if you're > changing the core of M5, I'm not sure that you want to take it out of > the source tree because if we fix something, you might miss the fix. > I realize that you're making drastic changes to the event queue, but > in general, I've felt that it was still quite manageable. > > Are you using mercurial queues? If not, I suggest you check them out. > They're a very good way of managing a set of changes to a parent > tree. Alternatively, you can just treat your tree as a branch and > periodically merge (and rebase if you like). > > Nate > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev >
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
