> I have more patches that I would like everyone to review. I haven’t yet > received any feedback on my last set of patches, so I’m going to hold off on > pushing them before Christmas. For those of you who haven’t had a chance > yet to review the previous set, you can review both sets at your leisure > over the next couple of weeks. I, like I’m sure many others, will be on > vacation thru 1/3.
I'm actually reviewing your patches right now. > The other major change in this new set of patches is I’ve resurrected the > old Ruby tester and made it a cpu MemObject, similar to the memtester. The > Ruby tester still needs to test atomics, dma accesses, and work with M5 data > rather than the ruby SubBlock object. I’ll make sure to this before I check > it in. What is the difference between the ruby tester and the memtester? Can we merge their functionality? _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
