> Good point... I agree, this doesn't work, the test will need to encode > the applicable ISA(s) directly. One thing this brings up is the > situation with tests like memtest, where it's independent of the ISA, > but unless you're insanely paranoid, there's no reason to run it N > times when you're doing a global regression just because you've built > N binaries to test N different ISAs. Maybe the same is true for other > internal unit tests. We'll have to work in a special case for these > kinds of things, I think.
I was actually hoping to create a NOISA option at some point specifically so we can compile the memory system without compiling any CPU models. One of these days. Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
