This should be packet: instead of m5: And just as an aside, we really need to get rid of these functions that just test a flag and make it easy to test the flags directly.
Nate On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Brad Beckmann <[email protected]> wrote: > # HG changeset patch > # User Brad Beckmann <[email protected]> > # Date 1268941833 25200 > # Node ID 72dbe1329a92ae7cfdde56e439715db8a5af66f3 > # Parent 7b9079a51a5292285396cf2c43015d89f8c27cc0 > m5: Added public method to determine if the packet includes data > > diff --git a/src/mem/packet.hh b/src/mem/packet.hh > --- a/src/mem/packet.hh > +++ b/src/mem/packet.hh > @@ -730,6 +730,11 @@ > data = new uint8_t[getSize()]; > } > > + bool > + includesDynamicData() > + { > + return flags.isSet(DYNAMIC_DATA); > + } > > /** > * Check a functional request against a memory value represented > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
