On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:59:08 -0400, Gabriel Michael Black <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hmm, maybe we should be building these regularly too... What do you > think, Ali? Would it be possible to return reserved1_func and use a > different code? It was reserved for me while I was doing the bottleneck analysis work and didn't want anyone to grab that ID. Once I pushed all of the bottleneck analysis changes, I changed reserved into the actual cp_annotate operations. So, everything worked as intended. reserved1_func shouldn't be used anywhere and shouldn't be added back to the file. Ali _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
