> On 2010-08-13 23:55:49, Gabe Black wrote:
> > src/cpu/exetrace.cc, line 115
> > <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/180/diff/1/?file=1883#file1883line115>
> >
> >     How about "false predicate" instead? I don't think the word predicate 
> > is being used right here. This is partially just personal taste.

A search of papers for "predicate false" returns a lot of hits, so it has been 
used before.


- Ali


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/180/#review180
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2010-08-13 10:10:25, Ali Saidi wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/180/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-08-13 10:10:25)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> CPU: Make Exec trace to print predication result (if false) for memory 
> instructions
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh 3c48b2b3cb83 
>   src/cpu/exetrace.cc 3c48b2b3cb83 
>   src/cpu/o3/lsq_unit_impl.hh 3c48b2b3cb83 
>   src/cpu/simple/base.hh 3c48b2b3cb83 
>   src/sim/insttracer.hh 3c48b2b3cb83 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/180/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ali
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to