Hello, This is related to the bug reported in http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03669.html. According to Gabriel's response a possible fix would be using the copyRegs() function defined in the ISA for the same task, and it actually seems to work.
Is there any reason that O3 provides its own copyArchRegs function? Is there any semantic difference? Shouldn't each ISA be responsible for such tasks? Thanks in advance, Ioannis _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
