> On 2010-10-17 21:29:17, Nathan Binkert wrote:
> > I personally don't think you need to submit diffs for stuff like this.

I did for two reasons.

1. My experience with reviews at VMware was that everything, no matter how 
stupid, got reviewed, so that's my instinct. I realize the overhead is probably 
not warranted here, so I'll try to set a higher bar as far as review-worthiness.
2. Since this was an MIPS change, I wanted to give Korey a chance to object. 
I'll assume, unless Korey lets me know otherwise, that MIPS changes that don't 
break the regressions and that I have good faith belief don't break anything 
else can just go in.


- Gabe


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/276/#review393
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2010-10-16 14:55:50, Gabe Black wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/276/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-10-16 14:55:50)
> 
> 
> Review request for Default.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> MIPS: Get rid of the backdoor device copy/pasted from and only used in Alpha.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/dev/mips/Malta.py addb847910d2 
>   src/dev/mips/MipsBackdoor.py addb847910d2 
>   src/dev/mips/SConscript addb847910d2 
>   src/dev/mips/backdoor.hh addb847910d2 
>   src/dev/mips/backdoor.cc addb847910d2 
> 
> Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/276/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gabe
> 
>

_______________________________________________
m5-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev

Reply via email to