> On 2011-01-09 18:35:49, Ali Saidi wrote: > > Wasn't the alpha name for this load locked? That name or the ARM name (load > > exclusive) seems to make more sense to me than load linked.
I choosed load linked because I think that is the more generally accepted computer science term for this type of synchronizaiton. Since this is on the Ruby side, I didn't want to use the ISA specific term. - Brad ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/391/#review685 ----------------------------------------------------------- On 2011-01-10 08:52:22, Brad Beckmann wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/391/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-01-10 08:52:22) > > > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and > Nathan Binkert. > > > Summary > ------- > > Ruby: Update the Ruby request type names for LL/SC > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/mem/ruby/libruby.hh b5d03e87db4e > src/mem/ruby/libruby.cc b5d03e87db4e > src/mem/ruby/recorder/TraceRecord.cc b5d03e87db4e > src/mem/ruby/system/DMASequencer.cc b5d03e87db4e > src/mem/ruby/system/RubyPort.cc b5d03e87db4e > src/mem/ruby/system/Sequencer.cc b5d03e87db4e > > Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/391/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Brad > >
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
