Well I just realized that I don't have permissions to add new bug reports to Flyspray. My Flyspray user id is beckmabd if anyone would like to grant me permissions. Thanks!
The checkpoint tester is a script located in "util/checkpoint_test.py" that Ali recently pointed me to. The script is commented well and fully describes what it does and how to run it. When I run a small test using X86_FS, the script identifies the following mismatches: Cmd: util/checkpoint-tester.py -i 2000 -- build/ALPHA_FS_MOESI_hammer/m5.debug configs/example/fs.py --script test/halt.sh Diff output: --- checkpoint-test/m5out/cpt.10000/m5.cpt Wed Jan 12 14:59:28 2011 +++ checkpoint-test/test.4/cpt.10000/m5.cpt Wed Jan 12 15:00:42 2011 @@ -10,20 +10,20 @@ so_state=2 locked=false _status=1 -instCnt=10 +instCnt=9 [system.cpu.xc.0] _status=0 -funcExeInst=16 +funcExeInst=15 quiesceEndTick=0 iplLast=0 iplLastTick=0 floatRegs.i=0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -intRegs=549755813888 0 2097152 0 0 0 590336 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2097208 380 0 0 0 0 2097189 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 +intRegs=549755813888 0 2097152 0 0 0 590336 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18446743523955834880 2097182 380 0 0 0 0 2097189 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 133 0 0 0 0 0 0 _pc=2097202 -_npc=2097208 -_upc=1 -_nupc=2 +_npc=2097210 +_upc=0 +_nupc=1 regVal=3758096401 0 0 458752 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4294905840 1024 2 243392 0 1288 0 0 0 260 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1974748653749254 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1280 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132609 0 0 0 0 67108864 0 0 0 0 0 16 8 16 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 483328 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 483328 0 0 0 0 983295 983295 983295 983295 983295 983295 65535 65535 23 65535 65535 983295 655 35 45768 43728 45768 45768 45768 45768 45952 0 45952 45952 45952 43976 45952 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 276095232 0 [system.cpu.tickEvent] By the way, could we add this test to the regression tester? Brad > -----Original Message----- > From: m5-dev-boun...@m5sim.org [mailto:m5-dev-boun...@m5sim.org] > On Behalf Of Gabe Black > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 4:42 PM > To: M5 Developer List > Subject: Re: [m5-dev] Checkpoint Tester Problems > > Flyspray would be good. We don't use it like we should, but it's probably the > most appropriate place. I'm not familiar with the checkpoint tester. How > does it work (link to the wiki would be fine), and what were the differences? > > Gabe > > Beckmann, Brad wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > > > While using the checkpoint tester script, I noticed that at least > > X86_FS with the atomic + classic memory system encounters differences > > in the checkpoint state. The good news is that none of the patches I > > have out for review add any more checkpoint differences, but we still > > should track down the existing bugs at some point. Should I use > > flyspray to document the bugs, or would you prefer me to document > > these bugs some other way? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Brad > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > m5-dev mailing list > > m5-dev@m5sim.org > > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
