> > I'm ok with putting it in or leaving it out. I realized these settings would > be lost across a checkpoint and wanted to put this out there as a solution, > but I think I even mentioned in an email a while ago I wasn't sure how this > stuff would interact with checkpointing. > > My guess is that it's not really necessary and potentially not desired since you may go from a system without timesync to one with it or vice versa. It seems that it's just a matter of the user providing the same parameters twice in a row, no? (We generally already "ask" users to do this unless they're explicitly trying to change something)
Nate
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
