Both. I like both changes, but I figure that we should allow others to weigh in.
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Gabe Black <gbl...@eecs.umich.edu> wrote: > Did you mean you just wanted a second opinion on the RELEASE_NOTES change > before this went in, or that you wanted a second opinion on this too? The > former has happened but not the later. Are you ok with this going in now? > > Gabe > > > On 02/14/11 06:50, Nathan Binkert wrote: > > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/488/ > > Fine with me, though I'd like a second opinion. (I would like a second > opinion on the RELEASE_NOTES change). > > > - Nathan > > On February 14th, 2011, 1:22 a.m., Gabe Black wrote: > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and > Nathan Binkert. > By Gabe Black. > > *Updated 2011-02-14 01:22:11* > Description > > Util: Get rid of the make_release.py script. > > Since we're not doing releases any more we don't really need this script. If > we need it in the future, we can resurrect it from the history. > > Diffs > > - util/make_release.py (e8f4bb35dca9) > > View Diff <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/488/diff/> > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing listm5-dev@m5sim.orghttp://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > m5-dev mailing list > m5-dev@m5sim.org > http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev > >
_______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
