----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/589/#review981 -----------------------------------------------------------
src/sim/syscall_emul.hh <http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/589/#comment1357> Why is this change necessary? I'm not 100% sure why it was the way it was before, but I see no reason to change it either. Changing the fatal to a warn may be necessary to get some benchmark to run, but I'm talking specifically about the ones that would return -ENOTTY. - Gabe On 2011-03-17 16:06:13, Lisa Hsu wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/589/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated 2011-03-17 16:06:13) > > > Review request for Default, Ali Saidi, Gabe Black, Steve Reinhardt, and > Nathan Binkert. > > > Summary > ------- > > X86 ioctl: Another patch from Vince Weaver > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/arch/x86/linux/syscalls.cc 2e269d6fb3e6 > src/sim/syscall_emul.hh 2e269d6fb3e6 > > Diff: http://reviews.m5sim.org/r/589/diff > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Lisa > > _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list m5-dev@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
