> Are these just fixups where we were getting away with not including > needed files, and reordering the includes exposed that? Yes. Exactly.
> Or are there > other causes? Superficially, the fact that a fix-up was needed after > running your script doesn't look good for your script... I'm assuming > it's a one-time thing but just want to verify that. Should be a one time thing. I noticed a clever way to fix this in the google style guide that we could adopt if we choose. http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/cppguide.xml#Names_and_Order_of_Includes Nate _______________________________________________ m5-dev mailing list [email protected] http://m5sim.org/mailman/listinfo/m5-dev
